I don't understand artwork I saw Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

I dont understand artwork I saw - Essay Examplemalist movement of the time, choosing to indulge in her deliver vibrant, pulsing style of art that reflected not only her talents but her personal experiences as well (Kimmelman).Murrays art consists of bold twingetings which atomic number 18 usually centered around depictions of domestic objects and interiors but these everyday objects are transformed into diverse, fluid, multi-layered designs which often carry double meanings. The paintings borrow generously from the strong canvassing of Cubism and free rudderless forms of surrealism to turn the objects of the art into pliable formations (Moyer). While overly humorous or even cartoonish, her paintings have a deeper edginess which stems from her negative experiences in the art world. Theres a heavy(p) deal of pain and a great deal of tragedy and a great deal of anger in her work, so she expresses that anger and that pain in forms that seem kind of comfortable ...when you get close to them you realized that they can bite. Quoted by Robert Storr, the dean of the Yale School of Art (Sydell).Her 2005 piece is titled Do the Dance based on the name of a song by Ray Chalresand Betty Carter. The painting features a clear influence from the visuals of comic books and cartoon, with eye papa colors and shapes that seem to bulge and distort moving from one corner of the piece to the other. Murray counted Paul Cezanne, Pablo Picassoand capital of Mississippi Pollock as her main inspirations, but her own work is a blend of the styles of these different get the hang and she adds her own brand of insanity to the work. The painting features some familiar objects like an overturned and over menses bottle, faces in various stages of abstractism as well as bodies, organs and vaguely human shapes. But the general picture is shape shifting and gives a dizzy impression to the viewer.The painting showcases the fine painterliness and strong palettes (Horsely) that Murray was kno w for the edges between each object are finely defined and the shapes seem not